maximum people in a group?

[andrew172]

What do you think tha maximum amount of people in a group will be? Or do you think that there won't even be a limit?

 

[Banister]

I think I may need some more explanation. In which group are you talking of. I am a bit confused.

 

[andrew172]

I think I may need some more explanation. In which group are you talking of. I am a bit confused.

For example my work buddies and I hae been talking about forming an online group to go around slaying Tamriel in... so if you guys have been doing this, how many people are you planning to have in your group? one? two? twelve?

 

[SpaceTiger]

There will be a limit, but I'm not sure how many. I've always liked smaller parties (4 max) since those are more in line of the adventurer groups you'd see in JRPGs, lore tales, etc. You know, your four characters for a balanced party. It might be upwards into 8 or 10 though...which I personally don't care for.

Like four people going to a dungeon or cave: plenty of danger and fun to be had. Eight or ten going in, there's no danger of anyone possibly being killed, everything dies. Take Lord of the Rings...you had your melee, your ranged fighter, your wizard, and your tank (no healer unless you count Gandalf)...and the tag a longs (them Hobbits) while important to the story, don't really count towards a battle party.

 

[Stuck_X_Button]

I'm thinking 6-10 people in a group. If it's six or below there will be cluster groups anyway.

 

[SpaceTiger]

Six wouldn't be too bad or unmanageable. It's when you get a bunch of people that it looks like an orgy of bright lights and damage numbers.

 

[Tomba]

I like four or six as a good sized party. Could you imagine actually being a party of 10-12 people to fight a dragon...you all have to go into this cave and stuff, it's damp, windy, and crowded couldn't swing a dead skeever or anything.

 

[Ghost_of_Crash]

I'll sign off one 4-6 people in a group. I'm leaning more towards four, but there will be a limit. It's not much of a party without one.